4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Nokian
Line SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Número de testes
5
14
18
Best position
#2
#8
#1
Average position
4.2
13.4
6.1
Teste mais recente
2017
2026
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
33
153
47

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Line SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line SUV
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Line SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line SUV
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Line SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line SUV
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line SUV
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Line SUV
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação