4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Michelin
Primacy 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
3
6
18
15
1
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
4.7
6.1
9.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
126
146
47
225
64

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Custos

Custos
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação