4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
20
1
18
6
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#2
Average position
3.5
1.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2022
2025
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
384
64
47
146
40

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Michelin Primacy 4
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Eficiência de combustível
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Preço/valor
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação