4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
20
6
18
1
3
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.5
4.7
6.1
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2022
2026
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
384
146
47
64
40

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Michelin Primacy 4
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Eficiência de combustível
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Quilometragem
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação