4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
4
3
3
1
Best position
#3
#4
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
4.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
97
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação