4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
4
16
2
3
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
5.5
1.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2023
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
153
23
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação