4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
4
18
2
6
3
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#3
#2
Average position
12.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
111
47
23
146
40

Molhado

Molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Guia lateral húmida
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Seco

Seco
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Conforto

Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação