4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
16
6
1
4
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
Posição média
1.5
5.5
4.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
54
153
146
66
40

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Frenagem úmida
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Neve
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Seco
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Custos
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store