Comparação: Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Prémio

Michelin

ALPIN 6

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

ALPIN 6

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-005

Número de testes

31

21

19

49

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

Average position

4.4

7.1

11.2

3.2

Teste mais recente

2024

2021

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

88

76

213

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado

80%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

84%

Hankook

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

76%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Frenagem úmida

Michelin ALPIN 6

78%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Michelin ALPIN 6

85%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Curva em círculo molhado

Michelin ALPIN 6

77%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

86%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Michelin ALPIN 6

78%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Michelin ALPIN 6

82%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Desempenho em piso seco

83%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

77%

Hankook

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Travagem a seco

Michelin ALPIN 6

83%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

Manuseamento a seco

Michelin ALPIN 6

82%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

74%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Desempenho na neve

81%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

82%

Hankook

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

71%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Travagem de neve

Michelin ALPIN 6

82%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Tracção na neve

Michelin ALPIN 6

90%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

88%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Manipulação da neve

Michelin ALPIN 6

77%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

97%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Curvas em círculo na neve

Michelin ALPIN 6

74%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

56%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Conforto e ruído

87%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

80%

Hankook

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

74%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Ruído externo

Michelin ALPIN 6

81%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Conforto ao rodar

Michelin ALPIN 6

93%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

Economia

86%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

68%

Hankook

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Resistência ao rolamento

Michelin ALPIN 6

73%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

64%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Quilometragem

Michelin ALPIN 6

98%

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

67%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2021	205/55 R16	Ver
Autobild	Inverno	2019	225/45 R17	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

ALPIN 6

Winter i*cept RS2 W452

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação