4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
10
12
17
24
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
9.3
1.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
207
93
80
302

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
77%
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
92%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
42%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
42%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
86%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
81%
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
87%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
78%
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
87%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Conforto e ruído
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Ruído externo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Economia
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
50%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
90%
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
42%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Inverno
2024205/55 R16Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação