4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
3
28
49
17
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
8.0
3.2
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
115
213
80

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Preço/valor
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação