Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

ION FlexClimate

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

ION FlexClimate

Blizzak 6

Número de testes

3

1

14

Best position

#4

#1

Average position

4.3

1.0

3.6

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

27

188

Molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Desempenho em molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Manipulação da neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Tracção na neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Travagem de neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Encanto da neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Desempenho na neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Desempenho em piso seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Custos

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Quilometragem

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Preço/valor

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Ruído exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

ION FlexClimate

Blizzak 6

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação