Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

ION Evo

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Número de testes

3

1

3

Best position

#4

#1

#2

Average position

4.3

1.0

3.7

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

64

34

Molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Custos

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Custos

Seco

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação