Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Número de testes

3

23

3

5

Best position

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.3

3.7

2.2

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

176

34

63

Molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Travagem de neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Encanto da neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Manipulação da neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tracção na neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Custos

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Preço/valor

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Quilometragem

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Ruído exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação