4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
3
3
3
Best position
#4
#2
#2
Average position
4.3
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação