Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Número de testes

3

1

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

3.7

1.0

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

34

64

Molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Custos

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação