Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

Winter

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

e.Ziex

Número de testes

3

2

3

Best position

#4

#1

#2

Average position

4.3

1.5

3.7

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

65

34

Molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Custos

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Conforto

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

e.Ziex

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação