4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Barum Polaris 6

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Barum
Polaris 6
Número de testes
3
49
29
3
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
3.2
3.7
7.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
213
178
98

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Barum Polaris 6
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Barum Polaris 6
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Barum Polaris 6
74%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Barum Polaris 6
80%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Barum Polaris 6
83%
Encanto da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Barum Polaris 6
63%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Barum Polaris 6
85%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Barum Polaris 6
79%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Barum Polaris 6
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Barum Polaris 6
77%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Barum Polaris 6
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Barum Polaris 6
97%
Preço/valor
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Barum Polaris 6
92%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Barum Polaris 6
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Barum Polaris 6
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação