4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
3
23
21
17
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
6.7
1.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
107
133
80

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
92%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
68%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação