4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
3
23
49
17
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
6.7
3.2
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
107
213
80

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação