4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Barum Polaris 6

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Barum
Polaris 6
Número de testes
3
23
49
3
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
6.7
3.2
7.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
107
213
98

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Barum Polaris 6
74%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Barum Polaris 6
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Barum Polaris 6
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Barum Polaris 6
76%

Neve

Neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Barum Polaris 6
83%
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
Encanto da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Barum Polaris 6
63%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Barum Polaris 6
85%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Barum Polaris 6
89%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Barum Polaris 6
79%

Custos

Custos
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Barum Polaris 6
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Barum Polaris 6
97%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Barum Polaris 6
69%
Preço/valor
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Barum Polaris 6
92%

Seco

Seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Barum Polaris 6
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Barum Polaris 6
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Barum Polaris 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Barum Polaris 6
94%
Conforto
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Barum Polaris 6
87%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação