4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test profile

Kumho
PorTran CW51
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
1
18
6
Best position
#8
#1
#3
Average position
8.0
6.1
4.7
Teste mais recente
2019
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
21
47
146

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho PorTran CW51
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho PorTran CW51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho PorTran CW51
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho PorTran CW51
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho PorTran CW51
46%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho PorTran CW51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Neve

Neve
Kumho PorTran CW51
70%

Seco

Seco
Kumho PorTran CW51
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Kumho PorTran CW51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho PorTran CW51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Kumho PorTran CW51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Custos

Custos
Kumho PorTran CW51
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Quilometragem
Kumho PorTran CW51
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Gelo

Gelo
Kumho PorTran CW51
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação