4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Número de testes
10
13
18
1
23
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
4.3
6.1
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
104
123
47
64
188

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação