4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta HS52Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
10
3
14
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
3.6
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
104
40
188
34

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Desempenho em molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação