4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
10
16
4
3
6
3
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#3
#2
#3
#2
Posição média
6.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
104
153
111
40
146
34

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação