4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
10
18
23
14
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
6.1
3.3
3.6
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
104
47
176
188

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação