4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
10
10
13
18
1
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
9.3
6.0
4.3
6.1
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
104
123
47
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação