4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Número de testes
10
10
13
18
1
23
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
9.3
6.0
4.3
6.1
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
104
123
47
64
188

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação