4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Kumho Ecsta HS51Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS51

R14 – R18
Kumho Ecsta HS52Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Prémio
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus Prime 4Prémio
HankookHankook

Ventus Prime 4

7.1
R13 – R23
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

6.7
R14 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Número de testes
10
10
18
13
23
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
9.3
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.6
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2024
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
104
47
530
194

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Guia lateral húmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação