4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
10
18
3
26
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
9.3
6.0
6.1
3.7
2.2
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
104
47
34
66
40

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação