4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
10
18
10
13
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
9.3
6.1
6.0
4.3
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
47
104
123
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação