4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
18
10
3
26
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
9.3
6.1
6.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
47
104
34
66
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação