4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
18
10
26
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
9.3
6.1
6.0
2.2
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
47
104
66
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação