4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
21
14
3
Best position
#1
#2
#8
#2
Average position
9.3
11.9
13.4
3.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
98
164
153
40

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Desempenho em molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Guia lateral húmida
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Kumho Ecsta HS51
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Eficiência de combustível
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação