4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
28
23
19
49
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
Average position
8.0
6.7
11.2
3.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2021
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
115
107
76
213

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 3 testes

Desempenho em molhado
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Frenagem úmida
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber KRISALP HP3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kleber KRISALP HP3
73%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Travagem a seco
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
74%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Desempenho na neve
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Travagem de neve
Kleber KRISALP HP3
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Tracção na neve
Kleber KRISALP HP3
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Manipulação da neve
Kleber KRISALP HP3
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Kleber KRISALP HP3
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Conforto e ruído
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ruído externo
Kleber KRISALP HP3
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Conforto ao rodar
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Economia
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Quilometragem
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2020245/45 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2019225/45 R17Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação