4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
6
5
1
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
16.0
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
44
63
64

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação