4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

Test profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Número de testes
11
10
23
11
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
6.0
6.6
7.5
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2022
Tamanhos disponíveis
121
104
194
53

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Nokian Powerproof
79%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Ruído interior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Nokian Powerproof
80%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
50%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2022215/55 R17Ver
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2022215/55 R17Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação