Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

Médio-alto

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Dynaxer HP4

Ventus Prime 4

ULTRAC

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Powerproof

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Número de testes

11

13

—

23

11

26

Best position

#1

#2

—

#2

Average position

11.6

6.2

—

6.6

7.5

Teste mais recente

2024

2026

—

2025

2022

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

121

530

—

194

53

101

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

67%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

82%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

87%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

87%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

82%

Nokian

Powerproof

84%

Dunlop

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Frenagem úmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

96%

Vredestein ULTRAC

96%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

96%

Nokian Powerproof

88%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

88%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

46%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

88%

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Nokian Powerproof

88%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

79%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

88%

Vredestein ULTRAC

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

88%

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

79%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

86%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

95%

Nokian Powerproof

86%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

95%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

60%

Vredestein ULTRAC

87%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

87%

Nokian Powerproof

69%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

78%

Desempenho em piso seco

69%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

91%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

77%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

82%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

75%

Nokian

Powerproof

69%

Dunlop

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Travagem a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Vredestein ULTRAC

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

79%

Nokian Powerproof

90%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

79%

Manuseamento a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

92%

Vredestein ULTRAC

75%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

84%

Nokian Powerproof

59%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

59%

Conforto e ruído

86%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

71%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

67%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

81%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

62%

Nokian

Powerproof

72%

Dunlop

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Ruído externo

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

86%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Vredestein ULTRAC

57%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Nokian Powerproof

57%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

57%

Conforto ao rodar

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

86%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

86%

Nokian Powerproof

66%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

86%

Economia

60%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

81%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

49%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

52%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

49%

Nokian

Powerproof

56%

Dunlop

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Resistência ao rolamento

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

59%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

84%

Vredestein ULTRAC

59%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

42%

Nokian Powerproof

59%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

51%

Quilometragem

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

38%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

61%

Nokian Powerproof

38%

Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

61%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2022	215/55 R17	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2

Dynaxer HP4

Ventus Prime 4

ULTRAC

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Powerproof

SP Sport MAXX RT2

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação