Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Médio-alto

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Número de testes

11

3

14

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.6

3.3

3.6

3.7

Teste mais recente

2024

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

121

40

188

34

Molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Frenagem úmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Guia lateral húmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Desempenho em molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Travagem a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Desempenho em piso seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído interior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Custos

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Quilometragem

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Preço/valor

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação