4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
11
16
18
3
1
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
11.6
5.5
6.1
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
121
153
47
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação