Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Médio-alto

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Comparar também com

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Perfil do teste

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Número de testes

11

18

23

3

2

Melhor posição

#1

#2

#1

Posição média

11.6

6.1

3.3

3.7

1.5

Teste mais recente

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

121

47

176

34

65

Molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Frenagem úmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Travagem a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Manuseamento a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Ruído exterior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Conforto

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído interior

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Custos

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Quilometragem

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Preço/valor

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação