4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
11
23
11
26
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
6.6
7.5
7.5
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2022
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
121
194
53
101
40

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
89%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
70%
Eficiência de combustível
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação