Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Médio-alto

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test profile

Dynaxer HP4

PremiumContact 6

Turanza T005

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Número de testes

11

36

33

23

18

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.6

3.1

4.1

6.6

6.1

Teste mais recente

2024

2023

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

121

296

658

194

47

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

66%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

75%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

67%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Frenagem úmida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

96%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

71%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

59%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

57%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

51%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Desempenho em piso seco

63%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

71%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

80%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

76%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Travagem a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Manuseamento a seco

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

59%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Conforto e ruído

82%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

68%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

64%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

72%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ruído externo

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

90%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

71%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Conforto ao rodar

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

73%

Continental PremiumContact 6

64%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

56%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Economia

62%

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

79%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

62%

Falken

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Resistência ao rolamento

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

55%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

96%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Quilometragem

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

53%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

61%

Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2021	205/55 R16	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

PremiumContact 6

Turanza T005

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação