4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Número de testes
11
33
10
23
11
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
4.1
6.0
6.6
7.5
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2025
2022
Tamanhos disponíveis
121
658
104
194
53

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone Turanza T005
90%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Nokian
Powerproof
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
96%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
46%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
95%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Nokian Powerproof
69%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
79%
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
84%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Conforto e ruído
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Nokian
Powerproof
Ruído externo
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
57%
Conforto ao rodar
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Economia
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
52%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
49%
Nokian
Powerproof
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
42%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
61%
Nokian Powerproof
38%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2022215/55 R17Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação