4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
11
14
18
3
3
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
11.6
3.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
121
188
47
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Desempenho em molhado
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Seco

Seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Conforto

Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preço/valor
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação