4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5

Test profile

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Semperit
Speed-Grip 5
Número de testes
21
49
24
23
12
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#3
Average position
7.1
3.2
2.7
6.7
9.3
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
88
213
302
107
93

Seco

Seco
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Travagem a seco
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
49%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
Desempenho em piso seco
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Comportamento em condução seca
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
Resposta da direcção seca
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Mudança de faixa seca
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%

Neve

Neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Tracção na neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
60%
Travagem de neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
66%
Manipulação da neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
72%
Encanto da neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
73%
Desempenho na neve
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
58%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
64%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Desempenho em molhado
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
Ruído exterior
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
69%
Ruído interior
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
67%
Conforto
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
78%

Custos

Custos
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
83%
Quilometragem
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
45%
Eficiência de combustível
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Preço/valor
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
79%

Gelo

Gelo
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%
Travagem brusca
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
28%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação