Comparação: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Prémio

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

R15 – R20

VS

Prémio

Continental

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Cinturato P7

Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Test profile

Ventus Prime3 K125

PremiumContact 6

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

Número de testes

22

36

18

14

Best position

#1

#8

Average position

4.9

3.1

6.1

13.4

Teste mais recente

2022

2023

2024

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

161

296

47

153

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado

76%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

76%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

65%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Frenagem úmida

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

89%

Continental PremiumContact 6

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

73%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

67%

Continental PremiumContact 6

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

49%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

89%

Continental PremiumContact 6

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

78%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

65%

Continental PremiumContact 6

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

58%

Desempenho em piso seco

93%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

77%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

86%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Travagem a seco

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

92%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

92%

Conforto e ruído

73%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

69%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Ruído externo

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

80%

Continental PremiumContact 6

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Ruído interno

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

74%

Continental PremiumContact 6

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Conforto ao rodar

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

64%

Continental PremiumContact 6

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

73%

Economia

71%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

67%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Eficiência de combustível

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

87%

Continental PremiumContact 6

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Quilometragem

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

54%

Continental PremiumContact 6

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2021	205/55 R16	Ver
ADAC	Verão	2021	205/55 R16	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Ventus Prime3 K125

PremiumContact 6

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação