Comparação: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Prémio

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Turanza 6

Test profile

Ventus Prime 4

Ecsta HS52

ULTRAC

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Número de testes

13

10

—

33

18

Best position

#2

—

#1

Average position

6.2

6.0

—

4.1

6.1

Teste mais recente

2026

—

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

530

104

—

658

47

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

82%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

72%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

87%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

90%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

79%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Frenagem úmida

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

88%

Vredestein ULTRAC

96%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Vredestein ULTRAC

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

60%

Vredestein ULTRAC

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Desempenho em piso seco

91%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

79%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

77%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

87%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

77%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Travagem a seco

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

90%

Vredestein ULTRAC

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

67%

Vredestein ULTRAC

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Conforto e ruído

71%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

71%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

67%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

66%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ruído externo

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Vredestein ULTRAC

57%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Conforto ao rodar

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

86%

Economia

81%

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

64%

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

49%

Vredestein

ULTRAC

73%

Bridgestone

Turanza T005

96%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

59%

Vredestein ULTRAC

59%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Quilometragem

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Vredestein ULTRAC

38%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2022	215/55 R17	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Ecsta HS52

ULTRAC

Turanza T005

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação