Comparação: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Médio-alto

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION FlexClimate

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Número de testes

1

16

4

3

1

5

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

5.5

12.0

3.3

1.0

2.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2023

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

27

153

111

40

64

63

Molhado

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Neve

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Seco

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Conforto

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Conforto

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Custos

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION FlexClimate

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação