4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Perfil do teste

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
1
16
10
3
18
6
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#3
Posição média
1.0
5.5
6.0
3.3
6.1
4.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2023
2026
2026
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
27
153
104
40
47
146

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Neve

Neve
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação